Selasa, 22 September 2009

Teaser Tuesday: How Can You NOT Love a Book with People-Dissolving Sea Monsters?

Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:




  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (Make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!

Ah, Quirk Classics. What would I do without you? You introduced me to Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and it was love at first bite. Now, you bring me Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, and I am drowned in a sea of beautiful prose, star-crossed lovers ad ichor-dripping sea monsters:


Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters
by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters
(Philadelphia: Quick Books, 2009)
Trade Paperback, 344 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9781594744426, US$12.95

My Teaser: “As the party watched in stunned horror, Miss Bellwether was wrapped inside the quavering blanket shape of the beast and consumed; the stomach acids of the enormous jellyfish dissolved her flesh, emitting a sickening sizzling noise, followed by a sort of unholy belch. And then, as quickly as it had come, the creature dragged itself back into the sea; the tide withdrew; and all that was left of Miss Bellwether was a pile of corroded bones, a lump of hair, and a whalebone corset” (62).

Sabtu, 19 September 2009

Belated Friday Finds: September 18, 2009

Friday Finds (hosted by Should Be Reading)

What great books did you hear about/discover this past week?
Share with us your FRIDAY FINDS!

I’m behind, I know, and the only excuse I gave give you is that I have been in training all week prepping to get ready to start teaching English 101 and my own grad classes this next week at Western Washington University. So … what do we have as finds this week? The first two were books that were referenced in the dreadfully disappointing The Science of Stephen King. The third is a book that I am itching to get my hot little hands on as it is a book of homages to Richard Matheson (this is were Stephen King and Joe Hill’s “Throttle” can be found in print). The fourth was a cool little gem I discovered as I was perusing the aisles of my new university library and seeing what they had in the way of scholarly references on Contemporary American Gothic (my field), and the last … well … who can resist a Doctor Who story read by none other than David Tennant himself. I mean, c’mon … it doesn’t get any better than that, does it? I submit that it does not!

Lest Darkness Fall by L. Sprague de Camp
Collision Course by Barrington J. Bailey
Doctor Who: Pest Control, An Exclusive Audio Adventure by Peter Anghelides, read by David Tennant

Kamis, 17 September 2009

The Science of Stephen King: From Carrie to Cell, the Terrifying Truth Behind the Horror Master's Fiction

by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg
(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007)
Trade Paperback, 264 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780471782476, US$15.95

ABCD Rating: DITCH

From the Cover: Human characters, not science, are the heart of King’s fiction, but Gresh and Weinberg (The Science of James Bond) use these tales as a jumping-off point in their latest pop-sci tie-in. In Carrie, Firestarter and The Dead Zone, mayhem arises from the use of psychic abilities, so the authors explore not only the history of such powers in fiction, but also human consciousness and modern neuroscience. The killer vehicles of King’s story “Trucks” are compared to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, rounded out with a short discussion of artificial intelligence. Dreamcatcher and The Tommyknockers lead to a look at the possibility of intelligent life elsewhere, from flying-saucer paranoia to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Discussion of The Stand includes a look at fictional and real plagues, while the parallel worlds and alternate histories at the heart of The Dark Tower bring up theoretical physics from relativity to wormholes.

My Review: Even after reading Gresh and Weinberg’s Why Did it Have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones, and being generally disappointed by what was on the page there, I had high hopes for this book (after all, I do like to consider myself a budding Stephen King scholar and have written a handful of papers on King and his books). They were not met.

I won’t waste too much of your time with this book, but suffice it to know that it had many of the problems that the Indiana Jones book did (Wikipedia as a source, unfocused information dump, random information, etc.) but even more than that … if you cannot even get the basic details of the plots of King’s novels correct, how in the name of Holy Hell do you expect me to believe that you have gotten the basic details of string theory, or bird flu pandemics, or artificial intelligence correct?

And we’re not talking about the details of an obscure short story or novel like “My Pretty Pony” or Gerald’s Game … I’m talking about the big ones: IT, Dreamcatcher, The Talisman and The Stand, to name just a few of the novels discussed wherein pretty key details of the books are presented by Gresh and Weinberg … AND ARE COMPLETELY WRONG! I have to wonder if they have actually read the books in preparation for writing The Science of Stephen King, or if they just Wiki-ed the books. It is especially bad when the error they make invalidates the entire point they are making. For example, in Gresh and Weinberg’s discussion of obsession and evil, they bring up IT and say “They [The Losers’ Club] wound the monster but must return years later as adults to kill It. During the interim years, from the time they are children fighting bullies to adulthood, they remain afraid of and obsessed with It” (229). What’s wrong with those sentences, you ask? Just the simple fact that the kids from the Losers’ Club do not remain “afraid of and obsessed with It” in the “interim years” between defeating Pennywise in 1958 and coming back in 1985, and since they don’t (with the exception of Mike Hanlon, the Losers’ completely forget Pennywise and the climactic events of their childhood in relation to Pennywise) these eight words completely undermine and undo the point Gresh and Weinberg about obsession and fear and evil. It is sloppy research and writing.

When I first started this book I thought, You know, I think I’m going to put this on my wish list and buy in the future, it’d be a nice book to have on the shelf as a reference. Now, after having slogged through all 264 pages … not so much. This is not to say that some of the information is not interesting, in fact if (and that is a big IF) Gresh and Weinberg have it right, I now get Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and have a general working knowledge of what Unified Field Theory and String Theory are. However, if Gresh and Weinberg can’t be trusted to get the small stuff right (Jonesy does not shoot the infected hunter in the beginning of Dreamcatcher) how can I trust them with the big stuff like Unified Field Theory or String Theory?

It’s best to not, and just skip this book altogether; and probably the rest of the books Gresh and Weinberg have penned together.

Rabu, 16 September 2009

A-Z Wednesday: From the Ashes of Sobibor: A Story of Survival


Here are the rules:
Go to your stack of books and find one whose title starts with the Letter of the Week.
Post:

  1. A Photo of the Book
  2. Title and Synopsis
  3. A link (Amazon, B&N, etc.)
  4. Come back here and leave your link in the comments
If you’ve already reviewed this book, post a link to the review as well. Be sure to visit other participants to see what books they have posted and leave them a comment (we all love comments, don’t we?) Who know? You may find your next “favorite” book.

THIS WEEK’S LETTER IS: F

My “F” Book is:

From the Ashes of Sobibor: A Story of Survival
by Thomas “Toivi” Blatt
(Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997)
Trade Paperback, 242 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780810113022, US$19.00

From the Cover: From the Ashes of Sobibor is the extraordinary account of a young man’s life during the German occupation of Poland. When the Germans invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, Thomas “Toivi” Blatt was twelve years old. He and his family lived in the largely Jewish town of Izbica in the Lublin district of Poland—a district that was to become the site of three of the six major Nazi extermination camps: Bełzeċ, Sobibor, and Majdanek. Blatt’s account of his childhood in Izbica provides a fascinating glimpse of Jewish life in Poland after the German invasion and during the period of mass deportations of Jews to the camps. Blatt tells of the chilling events that led to his deportation to Sobibor, of his separation from his family, and of the six months he spent at Sobibor before taking part in the most successful uprising and mass breakout in any Nazi camp during World War II. Blatt’s tale of escape, and of the five horrifying years spent eluding both the Nazis and late anti-Semitic Polish nationalists, is a firsthand account of one of the most terrifying and savage events of human history. From the Ashes of Sobibor also includes a moving interview with Karl Frenzel, a Nazi commandant from Sobibor.

My Thoughts: Picking an F Book was much harder than choosing my E Book. After perusing and re-perusing my shelves and choosing and rejecting a handful of other F Books, I finally spotted Blatt’s book (it was hidden behind some other books) and I suddenly knew that From the Ashes of Sobibor was the book to share in this week’s A-Z Wednesday. The reason for that is that I have a personal connection to this book: Three years ago when I had just began working as an assistant teacher at the charter school where I was for the last three years, the director (an Holocaust scholar) was able to convince Toivi Blatt to come to Springville, Utah, and discuss his experiences in the Holocaust and in Sobibor with the middle school kids. (He also did the same for parents and members of the community that evening, but I didn’t go to that one.) It was a really moving experience and one that I am not soon to forget nor, I suspect, will any of the kids. While Blatt was at the school, he was passing out copies of his book, From the Ashes of Sobibor, and I was able to get myself a copy and have Toivi Blatt sign the book for me. It is one of the most special books I have in my collection because of this. It is a small piece of a very important part of history that I have for my very own now, and that I will pass on to my children when the time comes. That probably came out more insensitive than I meant it to. What I mean to say is that this is a very special book, as it not only is the story of a Holocaust victim, but it also is something he touched and wrote in to me, and is therefore a direct and concrete connection to that event that is not, in the least, abstract. Anyway, the great sin in this story is … I haven’t had a chance to read the book yet. It really is something I need to pick up.

Selasa, 15 September 2009

Road Rage: Two Novellas (Audio)

by Richard Matheson, Stephen King and Joe Hill
read by Stephen Lang
(New York: HarperAudio, 2009)
MP3 Audiobook, 233 MB, 2.4 Hours, Short Fiction
ISBN: 9780061726354, US$19.99

ABCD Rating: ACQUIRE*

From the Cover: Road Rage unites Richard Matheson’s classic “Duel” and the contemporary work it inspired—two power-packed short stories by three of the genre’s most acclaimed authors. “Duel,” an unforgettable tale about a driver menaced by a semi truck, was the source for Stephen Spielberg’s acclaimed first film of the same name. “Throttle,” by Stephen King and Joe Hill, is a duel of a different kind, pitting a faceless trucker against a tribe of motorcycle outlaws, in the simmering Nevada desert. Their battle is fought out on twenty miles of the loneliest road in the country, a place where the only thing worse than not knowing what you’re up against, is slowing down…

This collection includes “Duel” by Richard Matheson and “Throttle” by Stephen King and Joe Hill.

My Review: Most people are familiar with Richard Matheson’s classic short story “Duel” since, as it says in the From the Cover synopsis above, it basically made Stephen Spielberg’s career. I have read quite a bit of Matheson’s work in the past, but “Duel” is not one of the stories that I had had the pleasure to read, so when I came across this audiobook (which included a new short story by Stephen King and Joe Hill) I jumped at the chance to listen.

I am here to tell you that everything you have ever heard about Richard Matheson’s “Duel” is true and then some. This is, in short, one of the best short stories I have ever had the pleasure of experiencing. Matheson’s David and Goliath-esque tale (for heaven’s sake, the main character’s name is David Mann, you don’t get much more allegorical than that, do you?) is a story whose brilliance lies in its simplicity: David versus the truck. It’s not even David versus the trucker because the trucker barely makes an appearance in the story, other than the side of a face or the wave of a hand. It is this faceless antagonist that makes “Duel” so terrifying. The villain is reduced to a faceless and nameless semi truck and trailer, and it is against this villain that David Mann must struggle. And struggle he does. “Duel” is an epic and extraordinarily tense tale that left me on the edge of my seat until the very end (and I knew how it turned out!) Matheson is at his best in “Duel” and Stephen Lang does Matheson’s words every justice they deserve in his reading. This is definitely one to keep an eye out for.

I don’t think I can say the same of “Throttle,” King and Hill’s contribution to He is Legend: An Anthology Celebrating Richard Matheson. While billed as an homage to “Duel” I think that “pale imitation” may be a better descriptor for what King and Hill have produced. In and of itself “Throttle” is a great story, and in a world where “Duel” was never written, “Throttle” would definitely fill that gap, however, when considered in the context of “Duel,” “Throttle” falls short on many levels. First and foremost, King and Hill give their antagonistic trucker a name, face and motive. I believe that they have done this in order to “humanize” their antagonist and make him “relatable.” This is well and good, as I said above, in a world where “Duel” never existed, but Matheson did write “Duel” and in his story Matheson, by leaving his trucker faceless, nameless and motiveless (at least to David Mann and the Reader), creates an “Everyman” situation into which the Reader can easily place him or herself. We have all been David Mann at some point or another in our driving career … having that trucker or driver ride a little too close, not knowing if we’re going to make it past the semi before the oncoming traffic reaches us, sucking in the diesel fumes, it is a very relatable and therefore terrifying story.

“Throttle” fails, and miserably I might add, in this respect chiefly because King and Hill’s trucker has a name, face and motive and the author’s have created a highly unique and intricately constructed set of circumstances that put the Tribe in the path of the truck. This does not allow for the everyman aspect that Matheson’s story has. I highly doubt that any of you who are reading this review have been or ever will be in the same set of circumstances in which King and Hill have thrust their biker gang. However, I am willing to bet dollars to donuts that most, if not all, of you have been in David Mann’s shoes … to a certain extent. Certainly not to the degree in “Duel” but we have all definitely dealt with the aggressive, even vindictive or out-and-out angry driver who uses their car as a potential weapon. They are out there, and that uncertainty of which driver is going to be the one who tries to run you off the road is part of the danger of driving, and this is what makes “Duel” effective in ways that “Throttle” is not.

“Throttle”’s level of violence and descriptive gore is also another sticking point I have with it, when compared to “Duel” but it is one that I am more willing to forgive King and Hill than their previous transgression (of giving the trucker humanity) because “Duel” is a psychological thriller. It is Mann against Truck and is, as the title suggests, a duel of endurance between these two entities. “Throttle,” on the other hand, is exactly that, a visceral story that once it gets started does not let up until the very end. Along the way, there is a lot of violence and blood and guts and gore (all described in the lingering detail that both King and Hill are known for), but it works for “Throttle” because King and Hill aren’t out to create a story of psychological thrills, but rather the literary equivalent of the “popcorn film.” In fact, come to think of it, “Throttle” would work well on the screen, filmed by a Tarantino or Bay; lots of explosions, lots of blood, fast-paced action and one hell of a climax. In fact, this description works well, considering that Spielberg filmed “Duel” because Spielberg is the type of filmmaker to look at the truck in “Duel” and realize that it is the truck that is the villain and not the driver and create his visual images and metaphors accordingly. King and Hill have none of that finesse in “Throttle” and as such, it is a less successful story than “Duel.”

Finally, I think where both “Duel” and “Throttle” succeed is in the ultimate feeling that one comes away with after reading these short stories. Granted, they are two very different concepts, but that does not make either any less effective than the other. In “Duel” one is left with a sense of the randomness of cruelty and evil. There is no motive for the truck(er) to do what it/he does, but that doesn’t make what he/it does any less cruel or evil. In fact, this seeming motivelessness serves to heighten the apparent cruelty and evil of the truck(er). In the real world evil and cruelty can appear very random to the outsider (and even to those on the receiving end) and “Duel” is an extension of that appearance and feeling, a heightened and exaggerated extension, yes, but an extension nonetheless.

“Throttle,” on the other hand, deals (as do so many of King’s stories) in ambiguity and the grey areas between the black and the white. King and Hill ask questions about the nature of responsibility, and complicate the societal assumptions that surround the identities of “victim” and “persecutor.” By the end of the story they make the reader/listener question their own beliefs about who the true victim in “Throttle” is and who is the true “Villain.” This ability to complicate a reader’s expectations on “good” and “bad” is, for the most part, something that King is pretty good with (and which Hill has shown an aptitude for in his writing) and which also speaks to their more modern take on Matheson’s decidedly “old school” story.

*I rate this audio anthology as an ACQUIRE but with reservations: I would recommend Matheson’s story without any reservations whatsoever to any and everyone. “Duel” is a stellar example of what the short story should be. “Throttle,” on the other hand (and it seems to be on “the other hand” a lot in this review) is one that I would hesitate to recommend, only because it pales so much when set against Matheson’s story. Of course, this collection comes with both, so if you are going to shell out money for it or check it out from your local library, or even borrow it from a friend, then by all means listen to “Throttle” … just be prepared to be let down after experiencing “Duel.”

Teaser Tuesdays: Money Well-Spent ... ?

Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:




  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (Make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!
About two days before I finished Lois H Gresh and Robert Weinberg’s Why Did It Have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones, Gresh and Weinberg’s The Science of Stephen King: From Carrie to Cell, the Terrifying Truth Behind the Horror Master’s Fiction arrived on hold for me at the library, and when I was done with Snakes, instead of moving on to the next book in my TBR pile (Robert Durban’s The Pines) I just had to pick up The Science of Stephen King. So, without any further ado … here is today’s teaser:


The Science of Stephen King: From Carrie to Cell, the Terrifying Truth Behind the Horror Master’s Fiction
by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg
(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007)
Trade Paperback, 264 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780471782476, US$15.95

MY TEASER: “In 1986, the U.S. government spent $42 million on developing defenses against infectious diseases and toxins, ten times more money than was spent in 1981. The money went to twenty-four U.S. universities, in hopes of developing strains of anthrax, Rift Valley fever, Japanese encephalitis, tularemia, shigella, botulin, and Q fever” (125).

Jumat, 11 September 2009

The Friday 56: "It's the Environment, Stupid"

The Friday 56 is hosted by Storytime with Tonya and Friends

RULES
  1. Grab the book nearest you. Right now.
  2. Turn to page 56.
  3. Find the fifth sentence.
  4. Post that sentence (plus one or two others if you like).
  5. Post a link with your post to Storytime (and here on Bryan’s Book Blog, I’d like to know what book you’ve got at hand).
Oddly enough, the closest books at hand either do not have a 56th page (a children’s picture book and a handful of audiobooks) or do not have any dialogue on page 56 (Silent But Deadly: Another Liō Collection by Mark Tatulli). However, the next closest book to hand was one of the books I’ll be teaching from this semester at WWU, Sustaining Words: Readings in Consumption and Complexity, Responsibility and Renewal edited by Scott Stevens (who is the composition director in the English Department). So, this week’s Friday 56 comes from an essay by Paul Hawken titled “A Teasing Irony”:
“It is like being a single parent when the dog has run away, the children are fighting, the dinner is burning, the babysitter hasn’t shown up, we are late for the PTA meeting, and have just spilled gravy on the carpet when someone doing a survey knocks at the door and wants to know how we feel about the proposed landfill at the edge of town” (56).