Selasa, 22 September 2009

Teaser Tuesday: How Can You NOT Love a Book with People-Dissolving Sea Monsters?

Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:




  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (Make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!

Ah, Quirk Classics. What would I do without you? You introduced me to Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and it was love at first bite. Now, you bring me Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters, and I am drowned in a sea of beautiful prose, star-crossed lovers ad ichor-dripping sea monsters:


Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters
by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters
(Philadelphia: Quick Books, 2009)
Trade Paperback, 344 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9781594744426, US$12.95

My Teaser: “As the party watched in stunned horror, Miss Bellwether was wrapped inside the quavering blanket shape of the beast and consumed; the stomach acids of the enormous jellyfish dissolved her flesh, emitting a sickening sizzling noise, followed by a sort of unholy belch. And then, as quickly as it had come, the creature dragged itself back into the sea; the tide withdrew; and all that was left of Miss Bellwether was a pile of corroded bones, a lump of hair, and a whalebone corset” (62).

Sabtu, 19 September 2009

Belated Friday Finds: September 18, 2009

Friday Finds (hosted by Should Be Reading)

What great books did you hear about/discover this past week?
Share with us your FRIDAY FINDS!

I’m behind, I know, and the only excuse I gave give you is that I have been in training all week prepping to get ready to start teaching English 101 and my own grad classes this next week at Western Washington University. So … what do we have as finds this week? The first two were books that were referenced in the dreadfully disappointing The Science of Stephen King. The third is a book that I am itching to get my hot little hands on as it is a book of homages to Richard Matheson (this is were Stephen King and Joe Hill’s “Throttle” can be found in print). The fourth was a cool little gem I discovered as I was perusing the aisles of my new university library and seeing what they had in the way of scholarly references on Contemporary American Gothic (my field), and the last … well … who can resist a Doctor Who story read by none other than David Tennant himself. I mean, c’mon … it doesn’t get any better than that, does it? I submit that it does not!

Lest Darkness Fall by L. Sprague de Camp
Collision Course by Barrington J. Bailey
Doctor Who: Pest Control, An Exclusive Audio Adventure by Peter Anghelides, read by David Tennant

Kamis, 17 September 2009

The Science of Stephen King: From Carrie to Cell, the Terrifying Truth Behind the Horror Master's Fiction

by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg
(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007)
Trade Paperback, 264 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780471782476, US$15.95

ABCD Rating: DITCH

From the Cover: Human characters, not science, are the heart of King’s fiction, but Gresh and Weinberg (The Science of James Bond) use these tales as a jumping-off point in their latest pop-sci tie-in. In Carrie, Firestarter and The Dead Zone, mayhem arises from the use of psychic abilities, so the authors explore not only the history of such powers in fiction, but also human consciousness and modern neuroscience. The killer vehicles of King’s story “Trucks” are compared to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, rounded out with a short discussion of artificial intelligence. Dreamcatcher and The Tommyknockers lead to a look at the possibility of intelligent life elsewhere, from flying-saucer paranoia to the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. Discussion of The Stand includes a look at fictional and real plagues, while the parallel worlds and alternate histories at the heart of The Dark Tower bring up theoretical physics from relativity to wormholes.

My Review: Even after reading Gresh and Weinberg’s Why Did it Have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones, and being generally disappointed by what was on the page there, I had high hopes for this book (after all, I do like to consider myself a budding Stephen King scholar and have written a handful of papers on King and his books). They were not met.

I won’t waste too much of your time with this book, but suffice it to know that it had many of the problems that the Indiana Jones book did (Wikipedia as a source, unfocused information dump, random information, etc.) but even more than that … if you cannot even get the basic details of the plots of King’s novels correct, how in the name of Holy Hell do you expect me to believe that you have gotten the basic details of string theory, or bird flu pandemics, or artificial intelligence correct?

And we’re not talking about the details of an obscure short story or novel like “My Pretty Pony” or Gerald’s Game … I’m talking about the big ones: IT, Dreamcatcher, The Talisman and The Stand, to name just a few of the novels discussed wherein pretty key details of the books are presented by Gresh and Weinberg … AND ARE COMPLETELY WRONG! I have to wonder if they have actually read the books in preparation for writing The Science of Stephen King, or if they just Wiki-ed the books. It is especially bad when the error they make invalidates the entire point they are making. For example, in Gresh and Weinberg’s discussion of obsession and evil, they bring up IT and say “They [The Losers’ Club] wound the monster but must return years later as adults to kill It. During the interim years, from the time they are children fighting bullies to adulthood, they remain afraid of and obsessed with It” (229). What’s wrong with those sentences, you ask? Just the simple fact that the kids from the Losers’ Club do not remain “afraid of and obsessed with It” in the “interim years” between defeating Pennywise in 1958 and coming back in 1985, and since they don’t (with the exception of Mike Hanlon, the Losers’ completely forget Pennywise and the climactic events of their childhood in relation to Pennywise) these eight words completely undermine and undo the point Gresh and Weinberg about obsession and fear and evil. It is sloppy research and writing.

When I first started this book I thought, You know, I think I’m going to put this on my wish list and buy in the future, it’d be a nice book to have on the shelf as a reference. Now, after having slogged through all 264 pages … not so much. This is not to say that some of the information is not interesting, in fact if (and that is a big IF) Gresh and Weinberg have it right, I now get Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and have a general working knowledge of what Unified Field Theory and String Theory are. However, if Gresh and Weinberg can’t be trusted to get the small stuff right (Jonesy does not shoot the infected hunter in the beginning of Dreamcatcher) how can I trust them with the big stuff like Unified Field Theory or String Theory?

It’s best to not, and just skip this book altogether; and probably the rest of the books Gresh and Weinberg have penned together.

Rabu, 16 September 2009

A-Z Wednesday: From the Ashes of Sobibor: A Story of Survival


Here are the rules:
Go to your stack of books and find one whose title starts with the Letter of the Week.
Post:

  1. A Photo of the Book
  2. Title and Synopsis
  3. A link (Amazon, B&N, etc.)
  4. Come back here and leave your link in the comments
If you’ve already reviewed this book, post a link to the review as well. Be sure to visit other participants to see what books they have posted and leave them a comment (we all love comments, don’t we?) Who know? You may find your next “favorite” book.

THIS WEEK’S LETTER IS: F

My “F” Book is:

From the Ashes of Sobibor: A Story of Survival
by Thomas “Toivi” Blatt
(Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1997)
Trade Paperback, 242 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780810113022, US$19.00

From the Cover: From the Ashes of Sobibor is the extraordinary account of a young man’s life during the German occupation of Poland. When the Germans invaded Poland on September 1, 1939, Thomas “Toivi” Blatt was twelve years old. He and his family lived in the largely Jewish town of Izbica in the Lublin district of Poland—a district that was to become the site of three of the six major Nazi extermination camps: Bełzeċ, Sobibor, and Majdanek. Blatt’s account of his childhood in Izbica provides a fascinating glimpse of Jewish life in Poland after the German invasion and during the period of mass deportations of Jews to the camps. Blatt tells of the chilling events that led to his deportation to Sobibor, of his separation from his family, and of the six months he spent at Sobibor before taking part in the most successful uprising and mass breakout in any Nazi camp during World War II. Blatt’s tale of escape, and of the five horrifying years spent eluding both the Nazis and late anti-Semitic Polish nationalists, is a firsthand account of one of the most terrifying and savage events of human history. From the Ashes of Sobibor also includes a moving interview with Karl Frenzel, a Nazi commandant from Sobibor.

My Thoughts: Picking an F Book was much harder than choosing my E Book. After perusing and re-perusing my shelves and choosing and rejecting a handful of other F Books, I finally spotted Blatt’s book (it was hidden behind some other books) and I suddenly knew that From the Ashes of Sobibor was the book to share in this week’s A-Z Wednesday. The reason for that is that I have a personal connection to this book: Three years ago when I had just began working as an assistant teacher at the charter school where I was for the last three years, the director (an Holocaust scholar) was able to convince Toivi Blatt to come to Springville, Utah, and discuss his experiences in the Holocaust and in Sobibor with the middle school kids. (He also did the same for parents and members of the community that evening, but I didn’t go to that one.) It was a really moving experience and one that I am not soon to forget nor, I suspect, will any of the kids. While Blatt was at the school, he was passing out copies of his book, From the Ashes of Sobibor, and I was able to get myself a copy and have Toivi Blatt sign the book for me. It is one of the most special books I have in my collection because of this. It is a small piece of a very important part of history that I have for my very own now, and that I will pass on to my children when the time comes. That probably came out more insensitive than I meant it to. What I mean to say is that this is a very special book, as it not only is the story of a Holocaust victim, but it also is something he touched and wrote in to me, and is therefore a direct and concrete connection to that event that is not, in the least, abstract. Anyway, the great sin in this story is … I haven’t had a chance to read the book yet. It really is something I need to pick up.

Selasa, 15 September 2009

Road Rage: Two Novellas (Audio)

by Richard Matheson, Stephen King and Joe Hill
read by Stephen Lang
(New York: HarperAudio, 2009)
MP3 Audiobook, 233 MB, 2.4 Hours, Short Fiction
ISBN: 9780061726354, US$19.99

ABCD Rating: ACQUIRE*

From the Cover: Road Rage unites Richard Matheson’s classic “Duel” and the contemporary work it inspired—two power-packed short stories by three of the genre’s most acclaimed authors. “Duel,” an unforgettable tale about a driver menaced by a semi truck, was the source for Stephen Spielberg’s acclaimed first film of the same name. “Throttle,” by Stephen King and Joe Hill, is a duel of a different kind, pitting a faceless trucker against a tribe of motorcycle outlaws, in the simmering Nevada desert. Their battle is fought out on twenty miles of the loneliest road in the country, a place where the only thing worse than not knowing what you’re up against, is slowing down…

This collection includes “Duel” by Richard Matheson and “Throttle” by Stephen King and Joe Hill.

My Review: Most people are familiar with Richard Matheson’s classic short story “Duel” since, as it says in the From the Cover synopsis above, it basically made Stephen Spielberg’s career. I have read quite a bit of Matheson’s work in the past, but “Duel” is not one of the stories that I had had the pleasure to read, so when I came across this audiobook (which included a new short story by Stephen King and Joe Hill) I jumped at the chance to listen.

I am here to tell you that everything you have ever heard about Richard Matheson’s “Duel” is true and then some. This is, in short, one of the best short stories I have ever had the pleasure of experiencing. Matheson’s David and Goliath-esque tale (for heaven’s sake, the main character’s name is David Mann, you don’t get much more allegorical than that, do you?) is a story whose brilliance lies in its simplicity: David versus the truck. It’s not even David versus the trucker because the trucker barely makes an appearance in the story, other than the side of a face or the wave of a hand. It is this faceless antagonist that makes “Duel” so terrifying. The villain is reduced to a faceless and nameless semi truck and trailer, and it is against this villain that David Mann must struggle. And struggle he does. “Duel” is an epic and extraordinarily tense tale that left me on the edge of my seat until the very end (and I knew how it turned out!) Matheson is at his best in “Duel” and Stephen Lang does Matheson’s words every justice they deserve in his reading. This is definitely one to keep an eye out for.

I don’t think I can say the same of “Throttle,” King and Hill’s contribution to He is Legend: An Anthology Celebrating Richard Matheson. While billed as an homage to “Duel” I think that “pale imitation” may be a better descriptor for what King and Hill have produced. In and of itself “Throttle” is a great story, and in a world where “Duel” was never written, “Throttle” would definitely fill that gap, however, when considered in the context of “Duel,” “Throttle” falls short on many levels. First and foremost, King and Hill give their antagonistic trucker a name, face and motive. I believe that they have done this in order to “humanize” their antagonist and make him “relatable.” This is well and good, as I said above, in a world where “Duel” never existed, but Matheson did write “Duel” and in his story Matheson, by leaving his trucker faceless, nameless and motiveless (at least to David Mann and the Reader), creates an “Everyman” situation into which the Reader can easily place him or herself. We have all been David Mann at some point or another in our driving career … having that trucker or driver ride a little too close, not knowing if we’re going to make it past the semi before the oncoming traffic reaches us, sucking in the diesel fumes, it is a very relatable and therefore terrifying story.

“Throttle” fails, and miserably I might add, in this respect chiefly because King and Hill’s trucker has a name, face and motive and the author’s have created a highly unique and intricately constructed set of circumstances that put the Tribe in the path of the truck. This does not allow for the everyman aspect that Matheson’s story has. I highly doubt that any of you who are reading this review have been or ever will be in the same set of circumstances in which King and Hill have thrust their biker gang. However, I am willing to bet dollars to donuts that most, if not all, of you have been in David Mann’s shoes … to a certain extent. Certainly not to the degree in “Duel” but we have all definitely dealt with the aggressive, even vindictive or out-and-out angry driver who uses their car as a potential weapon. They are out there, and that uncertainty of which driver is going to be the one who tries to run you off the road is part of the danger of driving, and this is what makes “Duel” effective in ways that “Throttle” is not.

“Throttle”’s level of violence and descriptive gore is also another sticking point I have with it, when compared to “Duel” but it is one that I am more willing to forgive King and Hill than their previous transgression (of giving the trucker humanity) because “Duel” is a psychological thriller. It is Mann against Truck and is, as the title suggests, a duel of endurance between these two entities. “Throttle,” on the other hand, is exactly that, a visceral story that once it gets started does not let up until the very end. Along the way, there is a lot of violence and blood and guts and gore (all described in the lingering detail that both King and Hill are known for), but it works for “Throttle” because King and Hill aren’t out to create a story of psychological thrills, but rather the literary equivalent of the “popcorn film.” In fact, come to think of it, “Throttle” would work well on the screen, filmed by a Tarantino or Bay; lots of explosions, lots of blood, fast-paced action and one hell of a climax. In fact, this description works well, considering that Spielberg filmed “Duel” because Spielberg is the type of filmmaker to look at the truck in “Duel” and realize that it is the truck that is the villain and not the driver and create his visual images and metaphors accordingly. King and Hill have none of that finesse in “Throttle” and as such, it is a less successful story than “Duel.”

Finally, I think where both “Duel” and “Throttle” succeed is in the ultimate feeling that one comes away with after reading these short stories. Granted, they are two very different concepts, but that does not make either any less effective than the other. In “Duel” one is left with a sense of the randomness of cruelty and evil. There is no motive for the truck(er) to do what it/he does, but that doesn’t make what he/it does any less cruel or evil. In fact, this seeming motivelessness serves to heighten the apparent cruelty and evil of the truck(er). In the real world evil and cruelty can appear very random to the outsider (and even to those on the receiving end) and “Duel” is an extension of that appearance and feeling, a heightened and exaggerated extension, yes, but an extension nonetheless.

“Throttle,” on the other hand, deals (as do so many of King’s stories) in ambiguity and the grey areas between the black and the white. King and Hill ask questions about the nature of responsibility, and complicate the societal assumptions that surround the identities of “victim” and “persecutor.” By the end of the story they make the reader/listener question their own beliefs about who the true victim in “Throttle” is and who is the true “Villain.” This ability to complicate a reader’s expectations on “good” and “bad” is, for the most part, something that King is pretty good with (and which Hill has shown an aptitude for in his writing) and which also speaks to their more modern take on Matheson’s decidedly “old school” story.

*I rate this audio anthology as an ACQUIRE but with reservations: I would recommend Matheson’s story without any reservations whatsoever to any and everyone. “Duel” is a stellar example of what the short story should be. “Throttle,” on the other hand (and it seems to be on “the other hand” a lot in this review) is one that I would hesitate to recommend, only because it pales so much when set against Matheson’s story. Of course, this collection comes with both, so if you are going to shell out money for it or check it out from your local library, or even borrow it from a friend, then by all means listen to “Throttle” … just be prepared to be let down after experiencing “Duel.”

Teaser Tuesdays: Money Well-Spent ... ?

Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:




  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (Make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!
About two days before I finished Lois H Gresh and Robert Weinberg’s Why Did It Have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones, Gresh and Weinberg’s The Science of Stephen King: From Carrie to Cell, the Terrifying Truth Behind the Horror Master’s Fiction arrived on hold for me at the library, and when I was done with Snakes, instead of moving on to the next book in my TBR pile (Robert Durban’s The Pines) I just had to pick up The Science of Stephen King. So, without any further ado … here is today’s teaser:


The Science of Stephen King: From Carrie to Cell, the Terrifying Truth Behind the Horror Master’s Fiction
by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg
(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2007)
Trade Paperback, 264 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780471782476, US$15.95

MY TEASER: “In 1986, the U.S. government spent $42 million on developing defenses against infectious diseases and toxins, ten times more money than was spent in 1981. The money went to twenty-four U.S. universities, in hopes of developing strains of anthrax, Rift Valley fever, Japanese encephalitis, tularemia, shigella, botulin, and Q fever” (125).

Jumat, 11 September 2009

The Friday 56: "It's the Environment, Stupid"

The Friday 56 is hosted by Storytime with Tonya and Friends

RULES
  1. Grab the book nearest you. Right now.
  2. Turn to page 56.
  3. Find the fifth sentence.
  4. Post that sentence (plus one or two others if you like).
  5. Post a link with your post to Storytime (and here on Bryan’s Book Blog, I’d like to know what book you’ve got at hand).
Oddly enough, the closest books at hand either do not have a 56th page (a children’s picture book and a handful of audiobooks) or do not have any dialogue on page 56 (Silent But Deadly: Another Liō Collection by Mark Tatulli). However, the next closest book to hand was one of the books I’ll be teaching from this semester at WWU, Sustaining Words: Readings in Consumption and Complexity, Responsibility and Renewal edited by Scott Stevens (who is the composition director in the English Department). So, this week’s Friday 56 comes from an essay by Paul Hawken titled “A Teasing Irony”:
“It is like being a single parent when the dog has run away, the children are fighting, the dinner is burning, the babysitter hasn’t shown up, we are late for the PTA meeting, and have just spilled gravy on the carpet when someone doing a survey knocks at the door and wants to know how we feel about the proposed landfill at the edge of town” (56).

Friday Finds: September 11, 2009

Friday Finds (hosted by Should Be Reading)

What great books did you hear about/discover this past week?
Share with us your FRIDAY FINDS!

There is nothing better than discovering new and interesting books, that is why I love this particular meme. Because the only thing better than finding a new and interesting books is sharing a new and interesting book. These are my entries for today. Flashforward was featured on another reviewer’s blog (and I apologize profusely, I can’t remember whose) but the premise sounded so interesting I had to immediately put it on hold (as a matter of fact, it is waiting at the library for me right now, along side Dragons of the Hourglass Mage … I don’t know which to read first!). Did you know there was a sequel to Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs? I didn’t. Now I do. Pickles to Pittsburgh is a great book. Look for the review on the blog later today. Mark Justice runs a blog titled I Was a Bronze Age Boy: The Ramblings of a Middle-Aged Comic Book, Crime Fiction and Pulp Fanatic where pretty much all he does is post cool and interesting covers to pulp novels, comic books and paperbacks. It’s a fun blog (Mark also hosts the Pod of Horror podcast, which I highly recommend if you are into the horror genre in all its many incarnation) and he recently featured Charles Beaumont’s Hunger. I was so intrigued by it, that when my sister-in-law wanted to know what book I wanted as a house-warming gift, I immediately pointed her in its direction (it is currently winging its way to me now *squeal!*). The Beast That Shouted Love at the Heart of the World is a book that I somehow missed when a friend of mine first reviewed it, but as I was going through his blog’s archives recently, I rediscovered it, and seeing that it has the infamous Harlan Ellison short story “A Boy and His Dog” I immediately added it to my Books To Buy pile. (As I think I’ve mentioned here before, “A Boy and His Dog” was a formative story reading experience for me in middle school … made me think that I wanted to do what Ellison did.) Finally, I came across the last book at my new local library, and while not strictly a “book” (i.e. no story) it is a great book of literary cartoons from The New Yorker and would be a welcome addition to any bibliophile’s library.

Flashforward by Robert Sawyer

Kamis, 10 September 2009

Booking Through Thursday: We Want ... Information

Well, another Thursday is upon us, and that means it is time for yet another Booking Through Thursday prompt. What will it be this week, you ask? Here you go…


Prompt: What’s the most informative book you’ve read recently?


Certainly the least informative book that I’ve read as of late was the book I just finished reviewing: Why Did It have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg. Beyond that, I’ve read a lot of fiction lately, and so I think that what it comes down to is a toss-up between the following books:

How to Survive a Robot Uprising: Tips on Defending Yourself Against the Coming Rebellion
read by Stefan Rudnicki
(Ashland: Blackstone Audio, 2006)
MP3 Audiobook, 42.2 MB, 3 Hours, Survival Guide
ISBN: 9780786171484, US$27.00

Reviewed HERE



...and...

The Omnivore’s Dilemma: A Natural History of Four Meals
(New York: Penguin Books, 2006)
Trade Paperback, 450 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780143038580, US$16.00

Reviewed HERE






Of course, these books are “informative” in wildly different ways and for wildly different reasons and accomplishing very different outcomes, but that does not make them any less effective. In fact, one could argue that they are actually quite complimentary, considering that in the coming robot rebellion and overthrow of mankind we will all be forced to forage for our meals, Pollan’s information on foraging and the ethics and moral implications (as well as the proper procedure for and best ways to accomplish said food gathering) are quite informative indeed.

Or is that reaching a little?

Until next Thursday…

Why Did It Have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones

by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg
(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2008)
Trade Paperback, 264 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780470225561, US$15.95

ABCD Rating: CHECK OUT

From the Cover: The Ultimate Indiana Jones Companion—The true history, supernatural wonders, and mysteries of Indiana Jones! Could you really bullwhip to swing across a chasm? Or rip out a man’s heart without killing him? Was there a Shanghai mob in the 1930s—and did the Nazis have a real-life connection to the occult? At last, here is the book that finally answers the Indiana Jones-related questions that have troubled you for years. It tells you everything you’ve ever wanted to know about the history, culture, and science behind your favorite Indy scenes and settings. You’ll find out the truth about the Thuggees and their deadly practices, ancient death traps, the Well of Souls, Kali worship in India, the infamous bizarre banquet that included chilled monkey brains, the Sankara Stones, the Cross of Coronado, the Holy Grail, and more. Get ready for adventure—and more than a few snakes—as you explore the secrets and stories of Indiana Jones and his world. The journey will take you around the globe and through history as you move from ancient Egypt to India, China and the United States, and from Biblical times to the Spanish Conquest to World War II. You’ll also learn about Indiana himself, including the origins of his trademark fedora, leather jacket, and bullwhip. So why did it have to be snakes? Read the book and find out.

My Review: As we were exploring our new libraries recently (we have access to both the local city public libraries and the county libraries … score!) this book was on the shelf and kind of jumped out at me as I went by. Of course, I had to throw it into the library bag and put it in my TBR pile. After all, I have read a similar book in the past, and enjoyed it, and having recently read one of Indy’s novelized adventures, I thought Why not?

Unfortunately, this is not a book that lived up to the expectations that I had for it. In fact, the only thing that made me rate it as CHECK OUT instead of DITCH was that there were a few gems of information in and amongst the general dross and tangential information that Gresh and Weinberg toss out there.

I have two main beefs with the book and its authors:

First, all too often Gresh and Weinberg describe a scenario from one of the movies (or the Young Indiana Jones Chronicles television series (remember that one?)) and then proceed to give all sorts of information about the person or event or thing but not address the central conceit of the book: Could or could not have Indiana Jones interacted with this person or participated in this event? An involved history of the Utah Territory or the Boy Scouts of America or Pablo Picasso is great, but I could get that in a history book or a biography. What I want to know is how does this fit into the Indiana Jones canon, which Gresh and Weinberg fail to do in all too many of the entries in the book.

Second, WIKIPEDIA IS NOT A VALID SOURCE TO CITE! It is a great website and one that can give you quick information, or simple tidbits of knowledge that are, on the whole, correct, such as who played Satipo in Raiders of the Lost Ark (Alfred Molina … who knew?) or who was Heinrich Himmler’s personal occultist (Karl Maria Gutberlet) but to use it again and again and then CITE the various web pages again and again in a book that is presented in a somewhat professional way is just lazy research, especially when many of the topics which Gresh and Weinberg are researching have numerous more valid sources to consult. I mean, honestly, is it that hard to find a book on the Ark of the Covenant, the Holy Grail or Sigmund Freud? It’s not as if the authors are trading in esoteric subject matter here. These are established myths and legends and archeological subjects and people of great notoriety that Indy encounters. When I discovered, quite by accident—I was wondering what one of the sources for a claim Gresh and Weinberg made—that Wikipedia was being cited in their bibliography, 90% of their credibility flew out the window. Especially since they should know better, after all, if the authors’ claim is to be believed, they are college professors!

As I have said, on the whole most of this book can be ignored or skipped, but there are a few topics that the authors address that are quite fascinating and go beyond middle school history class-style knowledge (such as the assassination of the Archduke Franz Ferdinand is what sparked WWI) … for example, the section on Nazis and the Occult is absolutely fascinating, and even though there are absolutely no sources whatsoever for any of the claims Gresh and Weinberg make, it was eye-opening to me the extent with which the Nazi High Command was obsessed with the occult. For example, if Gresh and Weinberg are to be believed, the Nazis did, in fact, send an expedition in search of such religious artifacts as the Ark of the Covenant and the Holy Grail, and Nazi SS troops were sent to Tibet and South America in search of mystical knowledge and learning; the SS even had an occult branch of their service, very similar, in fact, to what is presented in the Indiana Jones films (as well as the first Hellboy film, come right down to it).

So, it is with mixed feelings that I give this book a half-hearted endorsement. It is not a book that I would want in my library (or to have paid money for) but it is definitely worth checking out of your local library … just make sure you return it on time. I’m not even sure it is worth paying late fees for.

Rabu, 09 September 2009

A-Z Wednesday: East of Eden


Here are the rules:
Go to your stack of books and find one whose title starts with the Letter of the Week.
Post:

  1. A Photo of the Book
  2. Title and Synopsis
  3. A link (Amazon, B&N, etc.)
  4. Come back here and leave your link in the comments
If you’ve already reviewed this book, post a link to the review as well. Be sure to visit other participants to see what books they have posted and leave them a comment (we all love comments, don’t we?) Who know? You may find your next “favorite” book.

THIS WEEK’S LETTER IS: E

My “E” Book is:


East of Eden
by John Steinbeck
(New York: Penguin Books, 1986)
Paperback, 778 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780140049978, US$7.95

A searing novel about the oldest and most terrible of conflicts: brother against brother.

From the Cover: Adam Trask came to California from the East to farm and raise his family on the new, rich land. But the birth of his twins, Cal and Aron, brings his wife to the brink of madness, and Adam is left to raise his boys to manhood. One boy thrives, nurtured by the love of all around him; the other grows up in loneliness, enveloped in a mysterious darkness. As Steinbeck interweaves the stories of the Trasks and their neighbors, the prosperous, open-hearted Hamiltons, he portrays men and women determined to conquer not only the land but the forces of love and hate, trust and suspicion within their hearts.

My Thoughts: When I saw that this week’s letter was “E,” there was no doubt in my mind that the novel I would pick would be John Steinbeck’s East of Eden. I’m not even sure where to begin on this book. This was one of the books I had to read for my Eminent Authors: John Steinbeck class that I took this past Spring, and I was blown away by what Steinbeck manages to accomplish in this novel. It is definitely one of the best books I have ever read, and is now in the Top Five Best Books I Have Ever Read (up there with the likes of The Three Musketeers, The Shining, Flight and Moby-Dick). Though, rather than rehash all of that, I’ll just direct you to my review from March. The link is HERE.

Senin, 07 September 2009

Darwinia: A Novel of a Very Different Twentieth Century

by Robert Charles Wilson
(New York: Tor Books, 1998)
Paperback, 372 Pages, Fiction
ISBN: 9780812566628, US$6.99

ABCD Rating: BACKLIST

From the Cover: In 1912, history was changed by the Miracle, when the old world of Europe was replaced by Darwinia, a strange land of nightmarish jungle and antediluvian monsters. To some, the Miracle is an act of divine retribution; to others, it is an opportunity to carve out a new empire. Leaving an America now ruled by religious fundamentalists, young Guilford Law travels to Darwinia on a mission of discovery that will take him further than he can possibly imagine … to a shattering revelation about mankind’s destiny in the universe.

My Review: I’ve had this book on my shelves and in my TBR pile for about two years now, and it was only now, as we were moving from Utah to Washington State so I could attend grad school, that I could find the time to sit down and read it. What first drew me to Wilson’s novel was the synopsis from the back of the book (as transcribed above). I mean, really … who could resist a literary come on like that? I was hooked even before I had read a single page.

What I found within the pages of Darwinia was a novel that was much deeper and more in the realm of true science fiction than I had expected. Wilson executes a classic (and very subtle) bait-and-switch with the plot, and by the time the Reader realizes what is going on in the story, it is too late and they are drawn deep into the plot and invested heavily in the characters … especially that of Guilford Law.

I’ll try not to say too much about the plot because to do so would be to flirt with spoilers, so rather than do that, I’ll just leave you to discover the plot twists on your own.

I will say, though, that it was not what I expected and that is not necessarily a good thing. I am all for being surprised by a book, but I went into Darwinia with certain expectations, namely a kind of steampunk-ish adventure with strange creatures on a new continent that suddenly appears overnight, and for about half of the novel, that is what I got. Then, however, Wilson throws a hanging left turn into unadulterated science fiction that comes out of nowhere, and while I admire what he did (and I’ll say this: the plot twist he throws is brilliant and unlike anything I have seen in a long time), it took me a while to adjust my expectations to what Wilson had written. It was, to say the least, a hard thing to do.

That aside, though, Wilson has created an incredible alternate Twentieth-Century in Darwinia and in terms of character, he is an absolute genius. Guilford Law is one of the most believable and realistic fictional characters that I have encountered in a very long time. I was completely captivated by the situation(s) into which Wilson threw Law and then had him work his way out of. It takes quite a bit of effort to keep reminding yourself that this is in fact a fictional book, and that Guilford Law does not exist, and that is just about as high a compliment that I can think to give any one author.

All in all, Darwinia is a fascinating read, but when you go in, make sure to check your expectations at the door. Otherwise, like me, you may find yourself left high and dry halfway through the book and needing to reassess what you thought the novel was going to be about, because believe you me, no matter what you think Darwinia is about … you’re going to be wrong and Wilson will surprise you.

Teaser Tuesdays: That's Quite the Circumstance!

Teaser Tuesdays is a weekly bookish meme, hosted by MizB of Should Be Reading. Anyone can play along! Just do the following:




  • Grab your current read
  • Open to a random page
  • Share two (2) “teaser” sentences from somewhere on that page
  • BE CAREFUL NOT TO INCLUDE SPOILERS! (Make sure that what you share doesn’t give too much away! You don’t want to ruin the book for others!)
  • Share the title & author, too, so that other TT participants can add the book to their TBR Lists if they like your teasers!
I found this book on one of the shelves as I was browsing my new local library. (How fun is that? Getting acquainted with a new library?) And even though I had a different book at the top of my TBR pile, I decided to bump this one to the top because (1) it looked like a lot of fun, and (2) it looked like it would be a fairly quick read. So, what teasers does it have to offer? How about the following:


Why Did It Have to be Snakes?: From Science to the Supernatural, the Many Mysteries of Indiana Jones
by Lois H. Gresh and Robert Weinberg
(Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2008)
Trade Paperback, 264 Pages, Nonfiction
ISBN: 9780470225561, US$15.95

My Teaser: “The party of Adolf Hitler, the leader of 1930s Germany, stood for bigotry, intolerance, and racial hatred, all beliefs that were anathema to patriotic Americas, yet strangely enough, Indy was once associated with the hated symbol of the Nazi party, the swastika. Not by choice but by circumstance” (126).

Musing Mondays: We Are Listening...

Today’s Musing Mondays (from just one more page…) is as follows: What is your preferred method of listening to audiobooks? Where and when do you listen to them?


For the longest time, I was a book purist, meaning NO AUDIOBOOKS. I had a hard time concentrating on the book when I wasn’t reading the words on the page and so audiobooks seemed like something that I wasn’t cut out for.

Then, in 2003, a good friend of mine pushed me and pushed me and finally got me to listen to audiobooks. (At that time, it was still books on tape.) The audiobook that she got me hooked on was Stephen King’s Bag of Bones (I have since reviewed it twice on the blog HERE and HERE) and I have to say that after listening to King’s reading, I couldn’t get enough of audiobooks. Looking back at my old email reviews—from before I started this blog—after Bag of Bones I listened to three more Stephen King audiobooks, in that month, then another four the next month, two in June and then I discovered the Harry Potter audiobooks in July 2003 and my love affair with audiobooks was a sealed deal.

What changed? Well, I had to train my brain to be able to listen to a book while I was doing something else (usually driving) in such a way as to divide my attention, often in an unequal way (i.e. more devoted to driving than listening) but it soon became a great way to pass the time of my commute.

We were living in Seattle at the time and not only did the Seattle Public Library system have a great collection of audiobooks, but there was also Half Price Books where I could get audiobooks for very cheap. That is how I became the proud owner of Stephen King’s Bag of Bones and Hearts in Atlantis on cassette tape (for under $20 together) as well as quite a few other books on tape.

When we moved to Utah, I got a job at a place where they let us listen to music or audiobooks while we worked (it was interesting but painfully repetitive data entry) and my listening of audiobooks moved from cassettes to CDs to, eventually, MP3. In fact, it was another Stephen King audiobook that was my first MP3 audiobook: The Colorado Kid (read by Jeffrey DeMunn).

Once I started back to work on my Bachelors degree (in English—Literary Studies) audiobooks became the only way I was able to do leisure or pleasure reading, since my reading piles were soon dictated by a syllabus. Now, if you were to come across me, I will often have a print book in hand and an audiobook loaded onto my iPod for the car. So, audiobooks have become yet another way in which I get my literary fix.

Since I have had people ask me this in the past, here are some of my favorite audiobook readers; performers who I will go out of my way to get an audiobook that they read:

First and foremost is Frank Muller. Unfortunately Mr. Muller is no longer producing audiobooks, he was involved in a devastating motorcycle accident in 2001 in which he suffered severe head trauma. And, I have just found out that he died last year and that makes me very very sad. I can’t believe I missed that. Muller read many of Stephen King’s novels but he did other books as well, for example Moby-Dick and The Silence of the Lambs. Muller is the best there was, and you really haven’t experienced an audiobook if you haven’t heard one the Frank Muller narrated. My favorite Frank Muller audiobook is The Talisman by Stephen King and Peter Straub

Ron McLarty is another stellar reader. He also does a lot of Stephen King novels, but I also have heard him read Hunter S. Thompson and John Steinbeck. McLarty has a very earthy voice that gives any audiobook an immediate air of authenticity. He is a truly superb reader/performer. My favorite Ron McLarty audiobook is ‘salem’s Lot by Stephen King

Campbell Scott is another performer that I have discovered and absolutely love. He is the son of actor George C. Scott, and reads a number of great books, and is yet another reader who I discovered through Stephen King. (Scott reads The Shining which is a novel with special importance to me as I have staked my academic and professional career firmly in its pages.) However, like many other reads he narrates a number of great novels aside from Stephen King including Bryan Burrough’s Public Enemies and Annie Proulx’s “Brokeback Mountain.” He has a great authoritative voice and adds a certain veracity to any book he reads. My favorite Campbell Scott audiobook is The Shining by Stephen King

Jim Dale is an audiobook reader sans par. I know him chiefly through the seven Harry Potter audiobooks though he does read others (my favorite is his reading of Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol). The things that Dale can do with his voice in the service of Rowling’s story are nothing short of amazing. He makes an already magical set of books even more magical. In fact, in the service of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix Dale creates 140+ separate and distinct voices for each of the speaking parts in the book. My favorite Jim Dale audiobook is Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix by J.K. Rowling

George Guidall is an okay reader, and one that is so prolific that it would be surprising if you haven’t already heard a book narrated by him. He is a kind of Poor Man’s Frank Muller or Poor Man’s Ron McLarty. This is not to say that he is a bad reader of audiobooks, but just that there are better out there, if you’d prefer. Guidall is a kind of second-string reader, if you will. I don’t love him, but I don’t hate him either. My favorite George Guidall audiobook is Eaters of the Dead: The Manuscript of ibn Fadlan, Relating His Experiences with the Northmen in a.D. 922 by Michael Crichton

There are others out there that I highly enjoy, Stephen Lang, Tim Curry, Nathaniel Parker, Jeffrey DeMunn, and Rob Inglis. Now, I know I’ve been heavy on the male readers, but there are female readers out there that I enjoy: Kathy Bates, Mare Winningham, Sissy Spacek, Emily Bauer and Sally Darling leap to mind.

There is one, in closing, that I will warn you against. Under no circumstances pick up and listen to a book read by Ilyana Kadushin who is bets known for her narration of Stephenie Meyer’s popular Twilight series. She is the most uninspired and dull reader that I have ever encountered. She drones on and on and sucks all the life and joy out of the story she’s reading. To trot out the old cliché, avoid audiobooks read by Ilyana Kadushin as if they were the plague.